Author summary
45%24 analyzed articles/videos9,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alanna Durkin Richer results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 8,095 hits. Analysis detected 53,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,963 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,144 of 6,163 authors). This Alanna Durkin Richer is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Alanna Durkin Richer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
17%Alanna Durkin Richer (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 63,963
Article count: 24
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles64K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate