Author summary
45% 24 analyzed articles/videos 9,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alanna Durkin Richer results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 8,095 hits . Analysis detected 53,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,963 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,144 of 6,163 authors). This Alanna Durkin Richer is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Alanna Durkin Richer
Author details
Total words: 63,963
Article count: 24
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles64K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst