AP News52%

Justice Department asks to toss convictions of Oath Keepers 19%

By Michael Kunzelman12% Alanna Durkin Richer46%

4/14/2026, 9:30:49 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 998 faulty-reasoning hits from 695 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of 19% (16,676 of 20,408 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the article peer group.

Justice Department moves to toss seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys 
The Department of Justice seal is seen in Washington, Nov. 
28, 2018. 
(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File) 
With the White House in the background, President Donald Trump speaks at a rally on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington. 
(AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, file) 
MICHAEL KUNZELMAN and ALANNA DURKIN RICHER 
WASHINGTON (AP)  The Justice Department on Tuesday asked a federal appeals court to throw out the seditious conspiracy convictions of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers leaders who were sentenced to prison terms for leading members of the far-right extremist groups in attacking the U.S. 
Capitol to keep President Donald Trump in office over five years ago. 
Trump commuted the prison sentences of several Proud Boys and Oath Keepers leaders last January in a sweeping act of clemency for all 1,500-plus defendants charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack. 
The request by the Justice Department would go a step further and erase all the convictions for extremist group leaders, including Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes , who didn’t receive pardons last January. 
The move to abandon the convictions represented a stunning reversal from the Biden administration, which hailed the guilty verdicts as a crucial victory in its bid to hold accountable those responsible for what prosecutors described as an attack on the heart of American democracy. 
It’s part of the Trump administration’s continued efforts to rewrite the history of the Jan. 6 attack and downplay the violence carried out by the mob of Trump supporters that left more than 100 police officers injured. 
AP AUDIO: Justice Department moves to toss seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys 
AP correspondent Ben Thomas reports the Justice Department is seeking the dismissal of seditious conspiracy convictions over the Capitol Riot. 
In court filings, prosecutors asked the U.S. 
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to vacate the convictions so that the government can permanently dismiss the indictments. 
“The government’s motion to vacate in this case is consistent with its practice of moving the Supreme Court to vacate convictions in cases where the government has decided in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of a criminal case is in the interests of justice  motions that the Supreme Court routinely grants,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing signed by U.S. 
Attorney Jeanine Pirro. 
Juries in Washington, D.C., convicted the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers leaders of orchestrating violent plots to stop the peaceful transfer of power after Trump’s 2020 election loss to Democratic President Joe Biden. 
The department’s dismissal request also includes the convictions of Oath Keepers members Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson and Jessica Watkins and Proud Boys members Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl and Dominic Pezzola. 
Other extremist group members, including former Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio, received pardons from Trump on the first day of his second term in the White House. 
Rhodes was sentenced to 18 years in prison after he and several lieutenants were convicted in one of the most consequential cases arising from the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters. 
Prosecutors said Rhodes and his followers stockpiled guns for possible use by “quick reaction force” teams at a Virginia hotel, but they never deployed the weapons. 
Nordean’s attorney, Nicholas Smith, said they are grateful to the Justice Department for its “wise decision” in seeking dismissal of the convictions. 
“We don’t want a precedent that says that any physical confrontation between protesters and law enforcement means a crime akin to treason, such as seditious conspiracy,” Smith said. 
Former Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone , who was dragged into the mob and suffered a heart attack after a rioter shocked him with a stun gun , was disappointed but not surprised by the latest milestone in the dismantling of Capitol riot prosecutions. 
“I would remind Americans that these were traitors to this country,” Fanone said. 
“They planned, incited and carried out an insurrection.” 
ALANNA DURKIN RICHER 
Richer covers the Justice Department and federal courts. 
She joined The AP in 2013 and is based in Washington. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.3%Michael Kunzelman: 1.7%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Michael Kunzelman: 0.9%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic1.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 2.4%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.4%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Michael Kunzelman: 7.7%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect17.6%This article: 8.6%Michael Kunzelman: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion8.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.4%AP News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 29.9%Michael Kunzelman: 4.4%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias29.9%This article: 3.2%Michael Kunzelman: 0.9%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.7%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 5.7%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Michael Kunzelman: 0.5%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.9%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.9%Michael Kunzelman: 1.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority11.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.3%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.5%Michael Kunzelman: 3.8%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion23.5%This article: 5.3%Michael Kunzelman: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.1%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.3%Michael Kunzelman: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal6.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.5%Michael Kunzelman: 2.3%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Michael Kunzelman: 0.8%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.7%Michael Kunzelman: 4.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.3%Michael Kunzelman: 4.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

695 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers11%attributed speech621writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 61 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Smith • 22 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Smith • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Fanone • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Fanone • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Fanone

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words28% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Politically Left Leaning B-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%Michael Fanone: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Michael Fanone: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Michael Fanone: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.