Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Fanone results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61.9% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 61.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,190 of 26,105 speakers). This Michael Fanone is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Michael Fanone

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
39.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.9%61.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 46.4%46.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 46.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos