Gothamist⁠77%

Tornadoes confirmed in Westchester and New Jersey after severe storms ⁠7%

By Giulia Heyward⁠48%

7/22/2026, 11:08:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (20,388 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the article peer group.

Multiple tornadoes touched down in parts of New York and New Jersey on Tuesday as severe storms swept through the region, National Weather Service meteorologists confirmed. 
The National Weather Service confirmed an EF-0 tornado in the Purchase and Rye Brook areas of Westchester County, just north of New York City. 
The tornado uprooted several trees and downed utility wires as it traveled through the area. 
Tree branches and leaf debris were reported on the Hutchinson River Parkway, according to the weather service. 
The National Weather Service also confirmed multiple tornadoes in New Jersey as damage surveys continue. 
Tornadoes are uncommon, though not unprecedented, in the New York City region. 
Tuesday's tornadoes developed as severe thunderstorms brought heavy rain and flash flooding across parts of the tri-state area. 
During the storm, Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens were placed under flash flood warnings, and all five boroughs were under a tornado watch. 
The National Weather Service urged residents to watch for flooding on highways, streets and in low-lying areas. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 4.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.8%Giulia Heyward: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 19.9%Giulia Heyward: 8.9%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect19.9%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 3.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Giulia Heyward: 7.5%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Giulia Heyward: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 36.9%Giulia Heyward: 6.7%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority36.9%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 6.3%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.2%Giulia Heyward: 2.1%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.8%Giulia Heyward: 2.7%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice14.8%This article: 9.7%Giulia Heyward: 2.5%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination9.7%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Giulia Heyward: 3.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

176 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker47%attributed speech94writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 26 words • 100.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words100% of attributed speech32% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice+31.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%National Weather Service: 31.7%31.7%Indoctrination+20.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%National Weather Service: 20.7%20.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.