Speaker summary
39% 119 analyzed articles/videos 4,865.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Weather Service results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 528.572 hits . Analysis detected 2,797.431 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,865.333 analyzed words across 119 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,333 of 28,364 speakers). This National Weather Service is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. National Weather Service
Speaker details
Total words: 4,865.333
Article count: 119
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score119 analyzed videos4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst