Publication summary
50% 11 analyzed articles/videos 5,883 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Report results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,321 hits . Analysis detected 15,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,054 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (206 of 399 publications). This San Antonio Report is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 20,054
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles20.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst