Author summary
2% 2 analyzed articles/videos 338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TPR results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 94 hits . Analysis detected 630 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,093 of 6,357 authors). This TPR is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. TPR
Author details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst