Author summary
24% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephania Corpi results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 398 hits . Analysis detected 2,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,276 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,295 of 6,630 authors). This Stephania Corpi is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Stephania Corpi
Author details
Total words: 5,276
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst