Publication summary
54% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,883 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Report results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 1,295 hits . Analysis detected 14,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,110 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 51% (192 of 391 publications). This San Antonio Report is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 19,110
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst