San Antonio Gold Star children keep loved ones’ memories alive through video games 13%

By Eleanor Fitzgerald27%

7/23/2026, 10:00:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 655 faulty-reasoning hits from 473 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,158 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the article peer group.

For 13-year-old Aiden Deck, video games kept him connected to his dad even when he was deployed for the U.S. 
Air Force. 
The two played together constantly, up until July 11, 2021, the day Master Sgt. 
Christopher Robert Deck died while on active duty. 
“Every single day, even on the day he passed, we played Call of Duty and Assassin’s Creed,” Aiden Deck said. 
“Every time he was at work, he would let me play for him.” 
Deck had served in the military for 22 years before his death, leaving behind his wife Marisol, Aiden and siblings Christopher, 19, Mateo, 12, and Luna, 9. 
The couple met while both were serving in the Air Force. 
Now, his love of video games lives on among his family. 
The brothers have even gotten Luna into video games. 
She was only 4 when her dad died, but her older brothers now place her in front of their PC and set up the video games she likes to play. 
Together, they are all involved in Gold Star Gamers, a nonprofit dedicated to helping Gold Star children remember the parents they lost in service through video games. 
The Deck children have attended Gold Star Gamer camps in Texas and around the country, gaming with other kids who have also lost their parents. 
Since joining in 2022, they have played in multiple national tournaments put on by the organization. 
Gold Star Families are those that have lost a loved one during active duty military service. 
Last year, the San Antonio family participated in the first-ever Gold Star Gamers’ Cup, an event put on by USAA where children are paired with USAA employees to compete in an esports competition to represent the parents they lost. 
The event took place on July 11, 2025, the fourth anniversary of their father’s death. 
The Deck children came in first place. 
At the second annual edition of the tournament on Thursday, the 11 gamers were met with a surprise opponent: Spurs star Julian Champagnie, fresh off the NBA Finals this spring. 
Champagnie said his favorite part of the event was getting beaten. 
“It was actually pretty refreshing,” he joked, but the Spurs player was quick to point out that he notched a couple wins of his own. 
“Everybody did not beat me,” Champagnie said. 
“I did get beat a couple times, badly too.” 
The small forward hung around to pack school supplies for Operation Homefront’s Back-to-School Brigade, a second event USAA orchestrated Thursday to pack 1,400 backpacks for military kids. 
“This is Military City," Champagnie said of the Spurs' responsibility to give back. 
"It’s important for us to get in the community and show that love to them as well  because they’re coming through and sacrificing a lot for us.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 2.3%San Antonio Report: 1.5%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 1.4%San Antonio Report: 1.9%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.9%San Antonio Report: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.2%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.5%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Hindsight Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 15.0%San Antonio Report: 3.6%Framing Effect16.7%This article: 6.3%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 1.0%San Antonio Report: 0.9%Loss Aversion6.3%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.6%San Antonio Report: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 1.0%San Antonio Report: 3.9%Optimism Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 1.2%San Antonio Report: 2.1%Negativity Bias7.2%This article: 5.3%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 5.2%San Antonio Report: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 7.2%San Antonio Report: 0.8%In-Group Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 5.0%San Antonio Report: 1.9%Halo Effect9.9%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 2.6%San Antonio Report: 0.5%Recency Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.3%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 3.8%San Antonio Report: 2.4%Appeal to Authority20.3%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.2%San Antonio Report: 2.6%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.4%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 7.7%San Antonio Report: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion7.4%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.7%San Antonio Report: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.6%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 3.1%San Antonio Report: 2.5%Anecdotal18.6%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.7%San Antonio Report: 0.6%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.3%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 5.9%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 2.1%San Antonio Report: 2.4%Indoctrination5.9%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eleanor Fitzgerald: 1.6%San Antonio Report: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

473 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech347writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAiden Deck • 20 words • 100.0% coverageAiden Deck • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJulian Champagnie • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJulian Champagnie • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJulian Champagnie • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJulian Champagnie • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJulian Champagnie • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJulian Champagnie • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Aiden Deck

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words26% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+60.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Aiden Deck: 60.6%60.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.