Keyword summary
6% 17 analyzed articles/videos 4,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 6,263 hits . Analysis detected 32,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 72,567 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (35,376 of 35,861 keywords). This San Antonio is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. San Antonio
Keyword details
Total words: 72,567
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 1.0% BS Score17 analyzed articles72.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst