Author summary
3%4 analyzed articles/videos576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlos Nogueras Ramos results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 4,822 hits. Analysis detected 15,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,985 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,566 of 6,628 authors). This Carlos Nogueras Ramos is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Carlos Nogueras Ramos
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Carlos Nogueras Ramos (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 46,985
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.9% percentile
0.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles47K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate