Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Alejandra Martinez results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 4,574 hits . Analysis detected 14,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,828 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,202 authors). This Alejandra Martinez is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Alejandra Martinez
Author details
Total words: 47,828
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles47.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst