Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Terri Langford results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 4,487 hits. Analysis detected 12,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,395 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,202 authors). This Terri Langford is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Terri Langford
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Terri Langford (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 42,395
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles42.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos