Author summary
35%3 analyzed articles/videos1,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jess Huff results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 4,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,261 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,626 of 6,316 authors). This Jess Huff is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Jess Huff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
27%Jess Huff (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,261
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate