AP News53%

Texas is drenched by heavy rains as forecasters warn that more storms could bring dangerous floods 49%

By JOSH KELETY0%

7/14/2026, 11:43:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 62.9% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 564 faulty-reasoning hits from 245 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (10,698 of 20,882 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the article peer group.

Heavy downpours in South Texas washed out highways and stranded motorists Tuesday as forecasters warned that a threat of more severe weather could bring dangerous flooding to already drenched counties near the border with Mexico. 
Storms dumped up to a foot of rain in some rural areas of Texas, leading to dozens of high-water rescues across the region and officials shutting down portions of a busy highway for hours near Uvalde, about 80 miles (129 kilometers) west of San Antonio. 
A flood watch also included Kerr County, where catastrophic flooding last year along the Guadalupe River killed more than 100 people. 
No deaths or injuries Tuesday were immediately reported. 
Authorities on Tuesday posted videos of a rescue crew in a boat down flooded streets and one vehicle being swept away by fast-moving waters. 
Five people were rescued by members of the Texas Game Warden Search and Rescue Team and four were rescued by a local game warden, said Maggie Berger, a spokesperson for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 
In Uvalde, officials said there had been at least two dozen water rescues. 
They opened a local event center for anyone displaced by flooding. 
In Sabinal, officials were also making plans for a shelter. 
“Intense rain rates and compounding effects from multiple rounds of storms will result in a dangerous flash flooding threat through Thursday,” the National Weather Service said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 6.3%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 29.4%Josh Kelety: 10.4%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic29.4%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.6%Josh Kelety: 1.3%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Josh Kelety: 15.0%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.6%Josh Kelety: 1.3%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Josh Kelety: 0.5%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.3%This article: 10.6%Josh Kelety: 3.2%AP News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias10.6%This article: 62.9%Josh Kelety: 21.5%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias62.9%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 5.7%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 12.5%AP News: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Josh Kelety: 4.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect14.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 4.3%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 4.6%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 6.3%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 51.4%Josh Kelety: 11.8%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority51.4%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 6.3%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 3.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 3.9%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 13.3%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 8.0%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.8%Josh Kelety: 1.5%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal9.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 3.2%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.9%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.8%Josh Kelety: 4.6%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote9.8%This article: 10.6%Josh Kelety: 1.6%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection10.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 7.9%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 10.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%AP News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

245 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers25%attributed speech183writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMaggie Berger • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 26 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words42% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%National Weather Service: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-13.1 ptsWriter: 13.1%National Weather Service: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.