Topic summary
84% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Floods results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 2,438 hits . Analysis detected 12,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,681 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,713 of 15,775 topics). This Floods is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Floods
Topic details
Total words: 15,681
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst