Author summary
13%5 analyzed articles/videos1,678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Stengle results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,572 hits. Analysis detected 6,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,830 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,491 of 6,275 authors). This Jamie Stengle is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Jamie Stengle
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
13%Jamie Stengle (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,830
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos