Author summary
16%5 analyzed articles/videos2,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Boone results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,735 hits. Analysis detected 11,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,680 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,418 of 6,258 authors). This Rebecca Boone is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Rebecca Boone
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
14%Rebecca Boone (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,680
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos