Publication summary
28% 32 analyzed articles/videos 20,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MinnPost results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 7,495 hits . Analysis detected 80,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 104,568 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 27% (279 of 379 publications). This MinnPost is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 104,568
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score32 analyzed articles104.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst