Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maddie Robinson results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 135 hits . Analysis detected 604 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,734 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,532 authors). This Maddie Robinson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Maddie Robinson
Author details
Total words: 2,734
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst