Author summary
ā 78% 1 analyzed article/video 1,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pat Borzi results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 796 hits . Analysis detected 4,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ā 44% (3,589 of 6,315 authors). This Pat Borzi is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Pat Borzi
Author details
Total words: 4,953
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst