Author summary
2%1 analyzed article/video942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Twin Cities Documenters results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 649 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,826 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (5,857 of 6,202 authors). This Twin Cities Documenters is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Twin Cities Documenters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
6%Twin Cities Documenters (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,826
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751005.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos