Publication summary
0% 26 analyzed articles/videos 14,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox Weather results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 14,318 hits . Analysis detected 73,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,789 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 88% (48 of 379 publications). This Fox Weather is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 43,789
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.6% percentile 4.0% BS Score26 analyzed articles43.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 32.7% 32.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 17.1% 17.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Publication 0.0% 0.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Publication 32.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Publication 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 17.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 13.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst