Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayley Vawter results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 781 hits . Analysis detected 4,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,403 of 6,628 authors). This Hayley Vawter is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Hayley Vawter
Author details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 18.2% 18.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 18.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst