Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Fitzgerald results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 3,200 hits . Analysis detected 15,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,832 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (537 of 6,359 authors). This Kevin Fitzgerald is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Kevin Fitzgerald
Author details
Total words: 7,832
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.6% percentile 7.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 40.9% 40.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 25.4% 25.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 18.3% 18.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.3% 19.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.0% 16.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 40.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 19.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 18.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst