Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Atienza results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 4,647 hits . Analysis detected 15,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,248 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 88% (792 of 6,359 authors). This Julian Atienza is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Julian Atienza
Author details
Total words: 9,248
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.6% percentile 6.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 50.3% 50.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 20.3% 20.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Author 50.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 26.8%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 20.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst