Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angela Fortuna results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,639 hits . Analysis detected 10,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,269 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (702 of 6,196 authors). This Angela Fortuna is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Angela Fortuna
Author details
Total words: 6,269
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.7% percentile 6.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.0% 16.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.7% 18.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 16.1% 16.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.1% 26.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.4% 20.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst