Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kieran Sullivan results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 5,003 hits . Analysis detected 21,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,738 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (784 of 6,427 authors). This Kieran Sullivan is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Kieran Sullivan
Author details
Total words: 11,738
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.8% percentile 6.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 42.6% 42.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 16.7% 16.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 14.9% 14.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 42.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 25.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst