Topic summary
46% 63 analyzed articles/videos 29,966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natural Disasters results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 20,869 hits . Analysis detected 110,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 168,298 analyzed words across 62 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (15,927 of 16,559 topics). This Natural Disasters is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Natural Disasters
Topic details
Total words: 168,298
Article count: 62
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score62 analyzed articles168.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst