Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shaanth Nanguneri results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 2,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,409 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,132 of 6,363 authors). This Shaanth Nanguneri is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Shaanth Nanguneri
Author details
Total words: 2,409
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst