Publication summary
53% 16 analyzed articles/videos 4,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WSVN results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 2,490 hits . Analysis detected 16,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,975 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (208 of 379 publications). This WSVN is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 21,975
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score16 analyzed articles22K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst