WSVN55%

29 million in Northeast, including NYC, under tornado watch as severe thunderstorm threat looms 50%

By Jayme Berezdivin32%

7/21/2026, 11:26:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 393 faulty-reasoning hits from 483 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.1% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,034 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the article peer group.

Severe thunderstorms are marching across the Ohio Valley and into the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast, threatening major metropolitan areas along the Interstate 95 corridor. 
Some locations have seen multiple rounds of storms packing heavy rain and strong winds. 
More than 29 million people in parts of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Delaware and Connecticut are under a tornado watch until 9 p.m. 
ET, according to the Storm Prediction Center. 
New York; Philadelphia; Newark, New Jersey; and Bridgeport, Connecticut, are in the watch area. 
Damaging wind gusts greater than 60 mph are the most concerning threat and could occur almost anywhere across the overall risk areas. 
Stronger gusts are possible if storms cluster together to form bowing lines, which are storms that start to look more like a closed parenthesis on radar as they track east. 
As of Tuesday evening, about 130,000 people in the storm-affected areas were without power, according to Poweroutage.us . 
Hail and a few tornadoes cannot be ruled out, especially in parts of the Appalachians. 
Flash flooding is also possible, especially in areas that see multiple heavy storms in quick succession. 
Denise Davis, who lives in Clermont County, Ohio, told CNN affiliate WKRC that she brought her grandchildren to the basement as soon as she heard the tornado warning. 
“The winds picked up, the lights were flickering and then I heard a real loud bang, which of course was the tree falling onto the house,” she said. 
Davis added that everyone was in a safe position under the basement stairs when the tree fell. 
“I cried and then the grandbabies were crying,” Davis said, recounting the moment she first saw the tree on her house. 
“I just don’t know what to do from here.” 
Major cities along the I-95 corridor from Washington, DC, to New York could see severe thunderstorms through the evening commute, mainly in the 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. 
ET window. 
Two confirmed tornadoes have been observed in northern New Jersey and flash flood warnings are in place throughout New York City. 
The Big Apple’s sewer infrastructure is old and limited. 
Built over a century ago, the system is built to handle only about 1.75 inches of rainfall per hour. 
In recent years, as more extreme weather events become common occurrences, the system has showed its limits. 
When the system backs up under pressure of large amounts of rainfall in short periods of time, it results in flooded streets in low lying areas, homes and subway stations. 
New York City treats approximately 1.3 billion gallons of wastewater every day using a system made up of more than 6,000 miles of sewer pipes and 135,000 catch basins. 
About 60% of New York City uses a combined sewer system, where wastewater and stormwater share the same pipes. 
During heavy rain, excess stormwater can overwhelm the system. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.5%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.7%WSVN: 2.5%Confirmation Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.9%WSVN: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Jayme Berezdivin: 4.2%WSVN: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.6%WSVN: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 8.2%WSVN: 7.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.9%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.1%WSVN: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.9%WSVN: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.4%WSVN: 2.1%Pessimism Bias3.1%This article: 14.1%Jayme Berezdivin: 10.3%WSVN: 11.2%Negativity Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.0%WSVN: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.1%WSVN: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.9%WSVN: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.5%WSVN: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.6%WSVN: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.2%WSVN: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.8%WSVN: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.9%Jayme Berezdivin: 6.7%WSVN: 3.6%Appeal to Authority1.9%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.5%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.2%WSVN: 2.4%Hasty Generalization3.5%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 3.7%WSVN: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion12.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.2%Jayme Berezdivin: 2.5%WSVN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%Jayme Berezdivin: 3.6%WSVN: 2.6%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.2%WSVN: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.7%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.5%WSVN: 2.0%Unattributed Quote15.7%This article: 5.8%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.4%WSVN: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.8%This article: 3.5%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.6%WSVN: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice3.5%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

483 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech355writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageStorm Prediction Center • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coveragePoweroutage.us • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Davis • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Davis • 28 words • 100.0% coverageDenise Davis • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Davis • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Davis • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Denise Davis

83%flagged-word coverage
103 attributed words80% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Quote-first Misdirection+27.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Denise Davis: 27.2%27.2%Unattributed Quote-21.4 ptsWriter: 21.4%Denise Davis: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Denise Davis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.