Author summary
27% 5 analyzed articles/videos 685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jayme Berezdivin results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 623 hits . Analysis detected 3,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,423 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,030 of 6,598 authors). This Jayme Berezdivin is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Jayme Berezdivin
Author details
Total words: 6,423
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst