Man arrested, accused of assault and battery after attack on dog, owner in Wynwood 73%

By Jayme Berezdivin32%

7/19/2026, 5:50:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Confirmation Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 125 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,931 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the article peer group.

MIAMI (WSVN) - A man has been arrested after being accused of an attack on a man and his dog in Wynwood. 
44-year-old Jack Jonte faces multiple charges including aggravated assault, battery, and resisting a police officer. 
The incident happened on Wednesday, along Northwest Second Avenue near 22nd Street. 
The victim, Evan Motlong, said he was walking his dog when he encountered Jonte with two unleashed pit bulls who attacked his dog. 
While Motlong was calling police, he said that Jonte ordered the pit bulls to attack him, leaving him unconscious. 
Motlong was left with fractures on his face and other injuries, and his dog is recovering from a broken leg. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.2%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.7%WSVN: 2.5%Confirmation Bias15.2%This article: 12.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.9%WSVN: 0.9%Anchoring Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 4.2%WSVN: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.6%WSVN: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Jayme Berezdivin: 8.2%WSVN: 7.8%Framing Effect11.2%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.1%WSVN: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.9%WSVN: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.4%WSVN: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 33.6%Jayme Berezdivin: 10.3%WSVN: 11.2%Negativity Bias33.6%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.0%WSVN: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.1%WSVN: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.9%WSVN: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.5%WSVN: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.6%WSVN: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.2%WSVN: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.8%WSVN: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 6.7%WSVN: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.2%WSVN: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 3.7%WSVN: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 2.5%WSVN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 3.6%WSVN: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.2%WSVN: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.4%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.5%WSVN: 2.0%Unattributed Quote18.4%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.4%WSVN: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 1.6%WSVN: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Berezdivin: 0.0%WSVN: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

125 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker34%attributed speech83writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEvan Motlong • 23 words • 100.0% coverageEvan Motlong • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Evan Motlong

100%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words100% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+54.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Evan Motlong: 54.8%54.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.