Topic summary
59% 24 analyzed articles/videos 8,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arrest results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 5,003 hits . Analysis detected 29,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,846 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,282 of 15,365 topics). This Arrest is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Arrest
Topic details
Total words: 35,846
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score24 analyzed articles35.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst