Publication summary
23% 26 analyzed articles/videos 11,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These oilcity.news results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 1,826 hits . Analysis detected 22,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,400 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (367 of 410 publications). This oilcity.news is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 41,400
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score26 analyzed articles41.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst