Casper man serving 8 to 10 years for stabbing teen now charged with sexual assault from June 2025 4%

By Greg Hirst3%

7/23/2026, 11:56:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and Burden of Proof, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 370 faulty-reasoning hits from 536 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 17.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,133 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the article peer group.

A Casper man sentenced in January to eight to 10 years in prison for stabbing a teen multiple times in April 2025 is now charged with a reported sexual assault on a 16-year-old girl while he was on bond in that case last summer. 
Evan Jason Kirkendall, now 20, was transported from the Wyoming State Penitentiary to hear the first-degree sexual assault charge on July 14, 2026 . 
The charge carries a penalty of five to 50 years in prison. 
He is presumed innocent unless found or pleading guilty. 
The Casper Police Department responded to Banner Wyoming Medical Center shortly before 5 a.m on June 19, 2025, where the girl was undergoing a sexual assault exam. 
She named Kirkendall as the suspect, the affidavit said. 
Shortly after noon that same day, police were called to a disturbance at the girl’s house, where Kirkendall had returned and reportedly been confronted by the girl’s father. 
Kirkendall himself reportedly called police after running out of the house, saying the man had held a gun to his head and accused him of raping his daughter, according to the report. 
The girl later told Children’s Advocacy Project investigators that she had only recently met Kirkendall and found him polite, though others had warned her about him being involved in a stabbing. 
Both Kirkendall and the girl told police he had brought pints of vodka to be shared with others who were present in the basement of her parent’s home. 
She said that by midnight, it was just the two of them in the basement and she began falling asleep. 
She said she heard Kirkendall ask her if she was awake and she didn’t respond. 
She said she knew “for sure” that Kirkendall should have known she was asleep, as she did not respond or give any form of consent before Kirkendall allegedly pulled her pants down and subjected her to intercourse, according to the summary of her statements in the affidavit. 
Knowing about the stabbing, she said she froze and was afraid to stop him. 
A detective began interviewing Kirkendall at the station by 1 p.m. on the day of the disturbance. 
As the interview progressed, another detective got a warrant to collect evidence from Kirkendall’s body. 
Kirkendall reportedly told police at first that he had been drunk and ingesting 7OH-Kratom products, which he said affected his memory. 
Kirkendall reportedly gave more details as the interrogation progressed, and the detective told him Kratom was not known to affect memory. 
Lab results from both Kirkendall and the girl came back in October 2025 and showed Kirkendall had tested negative for alcohol, according to the affidavit. 
Swabs from his penis reportedly showed “very strong” statistical support for the presence of the girl’s DNA, while there was insufficient male DNA from the cervical swab to process, the affidavit said. 
Though Kirkendall is still in custody on the aggravated assault conviction, a $50,000 cash-only bond was set in the sexual assault case. 
Kirkendall waived his preliminary hearing in circuit court this week, and is expected to enter a formal plea in district court in the coming months. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 2.5%oilcity.news: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.1%oilcity.news: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Greg Hirst: 2.3%oilcity.news: 1.9%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.3%oilcity.news: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.7%oilcity.news: 4.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.2%oilcity.news: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Greg Hirst: 0.2%oilcity.news: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.4%oilcity.news: 3.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.8%oilcity.news: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Greg Hirst: 3.8%oilcity.news: 3.6%Negativity Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.2%oilcity.news: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.1%oilcity.news: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.6%oilcity.news: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Greg Hirst: 0.9%oilcity.news: 2.3%Halo Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.3%oilcity.news: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Greg Hirst: 1.6%oilcity.news: 2.2%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.8%oilcity.news: 1.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.2%oilcity.news: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 8.8%Greg Hirst: 0.8%oilcity.news: 0.7%Begging the Question8.8%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.5%oilcity.news: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.2%Greg Hirst: 0.7%oilcity.news: 0.7%Burden of Proof8.2%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.4%oilcity.news: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.7%Greg Hirst: 2.8%oilcity.news: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.7%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.3%Greg Hirst: 1.0%oilcity.news: 4.2%Unattributed Quote6.3%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.2%oilcity.news: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.1%oilcity.news: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.1%oilcity.news: 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

536 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.9%attributed speech515writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageEvan Jason Kirkendall • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Evan Jason Kirkendall

0%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words100% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Evan Jason Kirkendall: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.