Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aggravated Assault results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 401 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,986 of 16,562 topics). This Aggravated Assault is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Aggravated Assault
Topic details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.7%2.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos