Author summary
⁠14%5 analyzed articles/videos2,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tommy Culkin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 3,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,755 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (5,834 of 6,244 authors). This Tommy Culkin is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Tommy Culkin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠7%Tommy Culkin (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,755
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos