Local veteran to see August home electrical repairs following community support 12%

By Tommy Culkin11%

7/22/2026, 5:33:16 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 759 faulty-reasoning hits from 779 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,295 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the article peer group.

Pictured, Casper resident Roxy Helfrick poses outside his home that is currently in dire need of extensive electrical repairs. 
(Tommy Culkin, Oil City News) 
CASPER, Wyo.  Recently, Casper native and veteran Roxy Helfrick was faced with serious electrical problems at his house and repairs that were out of his price range. 
Now, thanks to the support from local nonprofits and other community members, he is expected to see the necessary work done in August. 
The electrical issues at the Helfrick residence stem from an outdated Federal Pacific Engineering panel, a type of equipment commonly installed in homes across the United States from the 1950s through the 1980s. 
Helfrick said his house, built in 1958, still utilizes this specific system, which has since failed laboratory testing. 
The primary defect in the panels, Helfrick explained, is that the breakers often fail to trip during an electrical overload. 
Instead of shutting down as intended, the breakers are prone to overheating and starting fires, a problem linked to thousands of residential fires nationwide each year. 
“The biggest thing is just the fire risk,” Helfrick told Oil City News. 
“I forget what the percentage is, how many home fires they say are starting in the United States every year from these panels, but it’s in the thousands.” 
Because of these safety risks, the panels no longer meet modern building codes and would not pass a standard home inspection, Helfrick said, making it difficult if not impossible to sell without an upgrade. 
Helfrick said electricians advise against attempting to repair these units because replacement parts are unavailable and any minor fixes are considered an insufficient “Band-Aid” for a serious hazard. 
Homeowners with these panels may also face significantly higher insurance premiums because of the documented fire risk, he added. 
Helfrick said living with the outdated system requires constant vigilance to avoid overloading the aging circuits. 
“You really can’t run the washing machine, TV and air conditioner at the same time,” Helfrick said. 
“The breakers won’t trip; they’ll just sit there, overheat and start a fire.” 
So worried of fires is Helfrick that he said he’s taken to unplugging every appliance any time he leaves home for an extended amount of time. 
He added that the threat of fire is particularly dangerous for him, as significant hearing loss could impede his ability to hear smoke detectors if he does not have his hearing aids in. 
Beyond the internal panel, the property faces an external electrical hazard involving the main power lines. 
Low-hanging lines currently run from a utility pole directly over the roof of the house to reach a front-mounted meter. 
The configuration poses a threat as a downed line could result in live wires lying across the roof of the house. 
Helfrick, who has lived at the home for roughly 25 years, said he doesn’t want to be forced to leave. 
“I really like it here, all things considered,” he said. 
“Leaving was definitely something I wanted to avoid.” 
When Helfrick was faced with the costs for the necessary repairs, he knew he was going to need help. 
“I had to swallow my pride,” he said with a smile. 
“This was one of those things I just couldn’t do on my own.” 
A veteran who spent two decades with the U.S. 
Navy, Helfrick decided to explain his situation to the Natrona County Veterans Unified Council. 
As it would turn out, he found just the help he needed. 
Through the Veterans Unified Council he was introduced to Veteran Building Charities, a nonprofit that operates as one of the 16 member organizations that comprise the council. 
Through Veteran Building Charities, Helfrick is now receiving the financial assistance needed for the work. 
VBC representative Marshall Clayton spearheaded the project, and said he’s been in talks with several contractors, city officials and more. 
While an initial GoFundMe campaign was used to jumpstart fundraising efforts for the project, Clayton said they are now close to covering the full cost of the replacement. 
While the GoFundMe has been closed, the charity is still accepting donations via check and through its website to finalize the remaining balance. 
According to Clayton, work is officially slated for Aug. 25 and 26. 
“I’ve just been championing this with Roxy all the way through,” Clayton said. 
“I’ve been reporting back to the group just on progress and stuff, so it feels great to see it start to come together.” 
For Helfrick, the community support means more than just the home repairs. 
“It’s been awesome to see,” Helfrick said. 
“It means the world to me. 
 It shows that they haven’t forgotten about the veterans.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 2.7%oilcity.news: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.5%oilcity.news: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Tommy Culkin: 1.7%oilcity.news: 1.9%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.5%Tommy Culkin: 0.1%oilcity.news: 0.2%Hindsight Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.6%oilcity.news: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Tommy Culkin: 3.0%oilcity.news: 4.4%Framing Effect4.5%This article: 6.9%Tommy Culkin: 1.4%oilcity.news: 0.8%Loss Aversion6.9%This article: 3.6%Tommy Culkin: 1.1%oilcity.news: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Tommy Culkin: 2.0%oilcity.news: 3.1%Optimism Bias9.5%This article: 2.1%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.7%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 4.1%Tommy Culkin: 3.8%oilcity.news: 3.6%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 1.3%Tommy Culkin: 4.3%oilcity.news: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias1.3%This article: 4.2%Tommy Culkin: 1.4%oilcity.news: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error4.2%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.9%In-Group Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.5%oilcity.news: 2.3%Halo Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 1.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.5%oilcity.news: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.6%Tommy Culkin: 1.3%oilcity.news: 2.2%Appeal to Authority3.6%This article: 1.7%Tommy Culkin: 0.5%oilcity.news: 0.6%False Dilemma1.7%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 1.2%oilcity.news: 1.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.1%Tommy Culkin: 2.7%oilcity.news: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion15.1%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.5%oilcity.news: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 1.3%oilcity.news: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%Tommy Culkin: 1.7%oilcity.news: 2.2%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.7%Tommy Culkin: 0.8%oilcity.news: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.7%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Tommy Culkin: 0.6%oilcity.news: 4.2%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 1.7%Tommy Culkin: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 8.9%Tommy Culkin: 2.1%oilcity.news: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice8.9%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.3%oilcity.news: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tommy Culkin: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Tommy Culkin: 1.3%oilcity.news: 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.5%

779 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers60%attributed speech315writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 28 words • 100.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 34 words • 100.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 16 words • 100.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMarshall Clayton • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMarshall Clayton • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMarshall Clayton • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMarshall Clayton • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarshall Clayton • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRoxy Helfrick • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Roxy Helfrick

75%flagged-word coverage
357 attributed words77% of attributed speech44% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice+8.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Roxy Helfrick: 14.0%14.0%Unattributed Quote+7.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Roxy Helfrick: 7.8%7.8%Quote-first Misdirection+3.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Roxy Helfrick: 3.6%3.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.