Topic summary
14% 1 analyzed article/video 779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Safety results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,337 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,244 of 16,562 topics). This Home Safety is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Home Safety
Topic details
Total words: 2,337
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst