Author summary
76% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Perkins results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,368 hits . Analysis detected 8,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,380 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,177 of 6,277 authors). This Nick Perkins is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Nick Perkins
Author details
Total words: 7,380
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 18.5% 18.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 18.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 13.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst