65th Annual Crazy Days takes over Downtown Casper 50%

By Nick Perkins76%

7/19/2026, 3:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 214 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.1% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,011 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the article peer group.

CASPER, Wyo. —Friday and Saturday were crazy in Downtown Casper, as the 65th Annual Crazy Days event took over the area. 
For two days, Downtown Casper saw a myriad of sales and specials from shops, stores, boutiques, restaurants, and more. 
There were sidewalk sales in abunance, and countless shops took part in the annual historic event. 
This year even featured a car show, which took over much of 2nd Street on Saturday. 
There was also a Kids Area, a Silent Disco, the ‘Wild Nights’ Concert at David Street Station featuring a Garth Brooks cover band, and more. 
It was a crazy weekend, to be sure, and we’ve got the pictures to prove it. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.4%Nick Perkins: 1.6%oilcity.news: 2.1%Confirmation Bias26.4%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Nick Perkins: 2.1%oilcity.news: 1.9%Availability Heuristic15.7%This article: 20.7%Nick Perkins: 0.6%oilcity.news: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic20.7%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 1.3%oilcity.news: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%Nick Perkins: 9.5%oilcity.news: 4.4%Framing Effect17.4%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.1%oilcity.news: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.2%Nick Perkins: 6.1%oilcity.news: 3.1%Optimism Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Nick Perkins: 1.0%oilcity.news: 3.6%Negativity Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.1%oilcity.news: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 2.0%oilcity.news: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.2%oilcity.news: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 7.1%oilcity.news: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 2.7%oilcity.news: 2.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 1.5%oilcity.news: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.2%oilcity.news: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.7%oilcity.news: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.2%Nick Perkins: 3.6%oilcity.news: 1.9%Hasty Generalization13.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.5%oilcity.news: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 12.9%oilcity.news: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 1.1%oilcity.news: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 2.6%oilcity.news: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 2.0%oilcity.news: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.2%Nick Perkins: 4.0%oilcity.news: 2.2%Anecdotal13.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 1.9%oilcity.news: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 18.5%oilcity.news: 4.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.7%oilcity.news: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 43.8%Nick Perkins: 3.4%oilcity.news: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice43.8%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 6.9%oilcity.news: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Perkins: 13.3%oilcity.news: 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

121 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.