Author summary
42% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Klark Byrd results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 502 hits . Analysis detected 2,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,313 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,713 of 6,630 authors). This Klark Byrd is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Klark Byrd
Author details
Total words: 5,313
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst