Author summary
23% 1 analyzed article/video 1,603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Dudley results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 2,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,809 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,445 of 6,227 authors). This David Dudley is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. David Dudley
Author details
Total words: 4,809
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst