Author summary
10% 10 analyzed articles/videos 1,675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Armando Tinoco results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 971 hits . Analysis detected 6,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,909 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,587 of 6,628 authors). This Armando Tinoco is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Armando Tinoco
Author details
Total words: 8,909
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst