Deadline27%

'The Odyssey's Tom Holland On Why He "Could Relax" After Robert Pattinson Casting: "You're So Good At Being A Dickhead" 30%

By Armando Tinoco10%

7/19/2026, 12:26:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 332 faulty-reasoning hits from 219 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,388 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the article peer group.

Tom Holland stars in Christopher Nolan’s *The Odyssey* and recently revealed how he felt when Robert Pattinson was cast in the film. 
In a recent appearance on EW’s *Around the Table*, Holland said he felt he “could relax” after he learned the *Batman* actor was set to play Antinous in the epic film. 
“Rob and I have made three movies together now, all very different,” Holland said in a roundtable with *Entertainment Weekly*. 
“I’ve loved every minute of working with Rob, and I’ve always felt like I’ve left the set a better actor because he raises the stakes of every scene. 
What was really exciting for me, and also really daunting, was that we get to establish the stakes of the movie for Matt [Damon]’s journey right at the beginning. 
I felt the weight of that pressure.” 
Holland continued, “I knew when I found out that you were playing Antinous that I could relax because you’re so good at being a dickhead.” 
Other films in which Holland and Pattinson shared credits were *The Lost City of Z* (2016) and *The Devil All the Time* (2020). 
*The Odyssey* also stars John Leguizamo, Zendaya, Benny Safdie, Charlize Theron, and many more. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.4%Armando Tinoco: 1.4%Deadline: 2.4%Confirmation Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.2%Deadline: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Armando Tinoco: 5.2%Deadline: 3.1%Availability Heuristic10.5%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.2%Deadline: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Armando Tinoco: 5.5%Deadline: 6.5%Framing Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.1%Deadline: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 1.1%Deadline: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.8%Armando Tinoco: 1.7%Deadline: 2.5%Optimism Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.6%Deadline: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%Armando Tinoco: 10.9%Deadline: 6.7%Negativity Bias16.4%This article: 12.8%Armando Tinoco: 2.2%Deadline: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.4%Deadline: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 30.6%Armando Tinoco: 3.9%Deadline: 6.1%Halo Effect30.6%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%Armando Tinoco: 1.4%Deadline: 1.3%Recency Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.5%Deadline: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.5%Deadline: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 3.1%Deadline: 3.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 5.5%Deadline: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 9.1%Armando Tinoco: 0.8%Deadline: 0.5%Red Herring9.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 4.2%Deadline: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.3%Deadline: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 1.2%Deadline: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.2%Deadline: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 2.1%Deadline: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.4%Armando Tinoco: 0.8%Deadline: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.4%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 2.5%Deadline: 2.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 9.1%Armando Tinoco: 3.6%Deadline: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection9.1%This article: 9.1%Armando Tinoco: 5.9%Deadline: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice9.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.8%Deadline: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Tinoco: 0.5%Deadline: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

219 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker64%attributed speech79writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTom Holland • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTom Holland • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTom Holland • 28 words • 0.0% coverageTom Holland • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTom Holland • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTom Holland • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tom Holland

78%flagged-word coverage
140 attributed words100% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Quote-first Misdirection-25.3 ptsWriter: 25.3%Tom Holland: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.3 ptsWriter: 25.3%Tom Holland: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.