Keyword summary
50% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Holland results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 3,431 hits . Analysis detected 21,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,935 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,182 of 35,675 keywords). This Tom Holland is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Tom Holland
Keyword details
Total words: 22,935
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst