Author summary
89% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Bradshaw results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 5,005 hits . Analysis detected 12,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,522 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,890 of 6,602 authors). This Peter Bradshaw is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Peter Bradshaw
Author details
Total words: 9,522
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 52.6% 52.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 52.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst